EXAMPLES OF OTA RECONCILIATIONS

Four reconciliation examples, with supporting evidence.

All properties, documents, rules, amounts, events and interfaces are fictitious. The examples illustrate a product in development; they demonstrate no processing of customer data, no official universal rules of the platforms and no amount actually recovered. The designation Booking.com does not imply any partnership.

EXAMPLE 1 · CONTROL OF COMMISSIONS

€24 commission invoiced beyond the calculated contractual amount.

For the fictitious reservation 4763928317 (July 12–14, 2026), the eligible room base is set at €272.00. The applicable fictitious contract provides for a commission rate of 15%. The final statement charges €64.80 in commission alone on the same basis.

Expected40,80 €

15% of €272.00

Observed64,80 €

Commission on statement

Difference24,00 €

Documented deviation

€272.00 × 15% = €40.80

COM-RULE-01 is a fictional contractual agreement between the hotel and the OTA: 15% on an eligible base of €272.00. StayRecon applies this rule; it does not create it.

Expected €40.80, observed €64.80: documented difference €24.00. The prepared file is not transmitted; no adjustment or payment is recorded.

BEYOND A SIMPLE TABLE OF DIFFERENCES

Usable results, with or without dispute.

Depending on the case, StayRecon prepares a correction request, flags missing evidence, tracks a credit note or retains a documented match.

The product is in development. The pilots will make it possible to validate these pathways on the sources and situations specific to the participating properties.